In our Oslo to Belgrade EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron GT by 60 minutes, completing the 2208km route in 25h 15min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 15min (60 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 18min
- Energy: ~360 kWh
- Distance: 2208km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
25h 15min |
26h 15min |
| Charging time: |
1h 18min |
2h 17min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~397 kWh |
~397 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (10 min, 17% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Wittstock (11 min, 19% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Tankstelle Radeburger Straße (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Bageterie Boulevard (10 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Shell Ladná směr Bratislava (11 min, 24% → 67%)
-
Stop 7:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (16 min, 10% → 73%)
- Arrival: Belgrade
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Importgatan (13 min, 26% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Väla Centrum (14 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Van der Valk Resort Linstow (11 min, 12% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
Netto Sophie-Charlotten-Straße (14 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Aral Tankstelle Radeburger Straße (17 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Bageterie Boulevard (12 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Shell Ladná směr Bratislava (10 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY Győr (11 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 10:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (14 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 11:
OMV Backa Topola jug (11 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Belgrade
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 60-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 2208km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 18min vs 2h 17min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~360 kWh vs ~494 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons