In our Oslo to Belgrade EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 19 minutes, completing the 2213km route in 25h 13min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 13min (19 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 12min
- Energy: ~344 kWh
- Distance: 2213km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
25h 13min |
25h 32min |
| Charging time: |
1h 12min |
1h 30min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~398 kWh |
~398 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (10 min, 22% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Wittstock (10 min, 27% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Tankstelle Radeburger Straße (10 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Bageterie Boulevard (12 min, 18% → 67%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 18% → 60%)
- Arrival: Belgrade
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (12 min, 19% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Clever Burger King (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Wittstock (16 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Tankstelle Radeburger Straße (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Bageterie Boulevard (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Shell Ladná směr Bratislava (11 min, 18% → 65%)
-
Stop 7:
Shell Tópark (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 8:
OMV Backa Topola jug (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Belgrade
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 19-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2213km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 12min vs 1h 30min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~344 kWh vs ~406 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons