In our Oslo to Berlin EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 by 23 minutes, completing the 988km route in 12h 57min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 57min (23 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 20min
- Energy: ~154 kWh
- Distance: 988km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
12h 57min |
13h 20min |
| Charging time: |
20min |
46min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~178 kWh |
~178 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
A.T.U (10 min, 11% → 55%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Importgatan (10 min, 42% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Väla Centrum (12 min, 19% → 49%)
-
Stop 3:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Van der Valk Resort Linstow (14 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 23-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 on this 988km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 20min vs 46min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~154 kWh vs ~172 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons