In our Oslo to Berlin EV duel, the Tesla Model Y Long-Range beats the Tesla Model S 2023 by 44 minutes, completing the 995km route in 13h 4min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Tesla Model S 2023's 505km range doesn't beat the Tesla Model Y Long-Range's 426km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Tesla Model Y Long-Range needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model Y Long-Range
- Total time: 13h 4min (44 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 33min
- Energy: ~175 kWh
- Distance: 995km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Tesla Model S 2023 |
Tesla Model Y Long-Range |
| Travel time |
13h 48min |
13h 4min |
| Charging time: |
59min |
33min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~179 kWh |
~178 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Tesla Model S 2023 Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (20 min, 24% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger (10 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger (17 min, 20% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Recharge Autohof Herzsprung (12 min, 10% → 32%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Tesla Model Y Long-Range Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (13 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
HEM Tankstelle (10 min, 36% → 63%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Tesla Model Y Long-Range Won
The Tesla Model Y Long-Range achieved a 44-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 2023 on this 995km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 33min vs 59min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~175 kWh vs ~187 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons