In our Oslo to Bratislava EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 64 minutes, completing the 1649km route in 20h 0min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 0min (64 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 4min
- Energy: ~296 kWh
- Distance: 1649km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
20h 0min |
21h 4min |
| Charging time: |
1h 4min |
2h 10min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~297 kWh |
~297 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (11 min, 16% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Circle K Tappernøje Vest (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
EnBW Schnellladepark (10 min, 24% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's TotalEnergies Autohof (10 min, 25% → 64%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Tankstelle Radeburger Straße (10 min, 16% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Bageterie Boulevard (13 min, 11% → 65%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Importgatan (15 min, 13% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Væggerløsevej (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Van der Valk Resort Linstow (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 6:
McDonald's TotalEnergies Autohof (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 7:
Rüblingsheide (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 8:
SachsenEnergie City Center (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 9:
Kardausova DC (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 10:
Orlen (11 min, 12% → 48%)
-
Stop 11:
MOL Zeleňák - Bratislava (10 min, 10% → 43%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 64-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1649km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 4min vs 2h 10min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons