In our Oslo to Brussels EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model Y Long-Range by 16 minutes, completing the 1465km route in 16h 31min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 31min (16 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 39min
- Energy: ~228 kWh
- Distance: 1465km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Tesla Model Y Long-Range |
| Travel time |
16h 31min |
16h 47min |
| Charging time: |
39min |
52min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~264 kWh |
~264 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Barbecue barn (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
JET Tankstelle Krempelsdorfer Allee (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle Teutopark (15 min, 10% → 71%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Tesla Model Y Long-Range Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (11 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
Clever Burger King (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Trave (11 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
EnBW Autohof (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 51%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 16-minute advantage over Tesla Model Y Long-Range on this 1465km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 39min vs 52min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~228 kWh vs ~258 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons