In our Oslo to Helsinki EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 65 minutes, completing the 1007km route in 23h 20min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 20min (65 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 39min
- Energy: ~185 kWh
- Distance: 1007km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
23h 20min |
24h 25min |
| Charging time: |
39min |
1h 42min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~181 kWh |
~181 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's Hälla (10 min, 11% → 37%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Circle K (19 min, 21% → 81%)
-
Stop 3:
Kauppakeskus Mylly (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Rastplats Kvarndammen (10 min, 26% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (10 min, 19% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
MAX (30 min, 13% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
VIRTA Schnellladesäule (37 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
Kauppakeskus Mylly (15 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 65-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1007km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 39min vs 1h 42min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons