In our Oslo to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron by 31 minutes, completing the 1769km route in 19h 28min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 28min (31 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 52min
- Energy: ~275 kWh
- Distance: 1769km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron |
| Travel time |
19h 28min |
19h 59min |
| Charging time: |
52min |
1h 22min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~318 kWh |
~319 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Rewe (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's Groß Mackenstedt (10 min, 11% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
HPC Lippestraße (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Paris
Audi Q6 e-tron Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Importgatan (10 min, 28% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Allego Erhvervspark (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Tankstelle Jesteburger Straße (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell Tankstelle Motorpark (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
Neoliet Boulderbar (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Aire de Tignée Nord (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 8:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (10 min, 14% → 60%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 31-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron on this 1769km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 52min vs 1h 22min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~275 kWh vs ~333 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons