In our Oslo to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the smart #1 Pro by 63 minutes, completing the 1769km route in 19h 28min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 28min (63 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 52min
- Energy: ~275 kWh
- Distance: 1769km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
smart #1 Pro |
| Travel time |
19h 28min |
20h 31min |
| Charging time: |
52min |
1h 54min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~318 kWh |
~319 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Rewe (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's Groß Mackenstedt (10 min, 11% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
HPC Lippestraße (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Paris
smart #1 Pro Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Importgatan (11 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (19 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 3:
Clever Burger King (10 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
OstseeCamp Lübecker Bucht (10 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
REWE (14 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 6:
Tecklenburger Land West (12 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 7:
HPC Lippestraße (10 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Bierset (12 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 9:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (16 min, 10% → 69%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 63-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro on this 1769km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 52min vs 1h 54min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~275 kWh vs ~346 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons