In our Oslo to Prague EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 10 minutes, completing the 1323km route in 16h 34min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 34min (10 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 33min
- Energy: ~206 kWh
- Distance: 1323km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
16h 34min |
16h 44min |
| Charging time: |
33min |
43min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~238 kWh |
~239 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
A.T.U (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Netto Sophie-Charlotten-Straße (13 min, 17% → 70%)
- Arrival: Prague
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (12 min, 19% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Clever Burger King (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Wittstock (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's (11 min, 13% → 62%)
- Arrival: Prague
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 10-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1323km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 33min vs 43min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~206 kWh vs ~243 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons