In our Oslo to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 26 minutes, completing the 998km route in 21h 18min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 18min (26 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 43min
- Energy: ~155 kWh
- Distance: 998km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
21h 18min |
21h 44min |
| Charging time: |
43min |
1h 11min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~180 kWh |
~180 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger McDonald's (21 min, 15% → 81%)
-
Stop 2:
Kuršu krogs (22 min, 10% → 30%)
- Arrival: Riga
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Preem Grums (10 min, 60% → 80%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger McDonald's (18 min, 18% → 79%)
-
Stop 3:
Rimi Lāčplēša iela (18 min, 10% → 26%)
-
Stop 4:
Kuršu krogs (25 min, 10% → 33%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 26-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 998km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 43min vs 1h 11min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~155 kWh vs ~183 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons