In our Oslo to Riga EV duel, the Audi Q4 40 e-tron beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 545 minutes, completing the 1000km route in 22h 36min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q4 40 e-tron needs only 4 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q4 40 e-tron
- Total time: 22h 36min (545 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 2h 3min
- Energy: ~185 kWh
- Distance: 1000km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
22h 36min |
31h 41min |
| Charging time: |
2h 3min |
1h 42min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~180 kWh |
~257 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Preem Lars Wivallius väg (10 min, 22% → 49%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger McDonald's (73 min, 11% → 88%)
-
Stop 3:
Rimi Lāčplēša iela (16 min, 10% → 28%)
-
Stop 4:
Kuršu krogs (24 min, 10% → 36%)
- Arrival: Riga
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Lekhyttans Kök & Kiosk (19 min, 14% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesla Supercharger (13 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
S-market Jomala (21 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
Neste Riviera Masku (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Liikenneasema Kivihovi (14 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 6:
Circle K Järve (14 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Circle K (11 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi Q4 40 e-tron Won
The Audi Q4 40 e-tron achieved a 545-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1000km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
Related Comparisons