In our Oslo to Riga EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 608 minutes, completing the 999km route in 21h 50min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 50min (608 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 17min
- Energy: ~179 kWh
- Distance: 999km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
21h 50min |
31h 58min |
| Charging time: |
1h 17min |
1h 58min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~180 kWh |
~257 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Preem Grums (10 min, 59% → 80%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger McDonald's (21 min, 16% → 81%)
-
Stop 3:
Rimi Lāčplēša iela (19 min, 10% → 27%)
-
Stop 4:
Kuršu krogs (27 min, 10% → 34%)
- Arrival: Riga
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Rastplats Kvarndammen (10 min, 20% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (12 min, 11% → 49%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesla Supercharger (16 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
S-market Jomala (23 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 5:
Kauppakeskus Mylly (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger ABC (15 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Circle K Järve (17 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Circle K (14 min, 10% → 54%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 608-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 999km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 17min vs 1h 58min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons