In our Oslo to Riga EV duel, the XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025 beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 611 minutes, completing the 1425km route in 21h 47min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025 needs only 4 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025
- Total time: 21h 47min (611 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 11min
- Energy: ~280 kWh
- Distance: 1425km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025 |
| Travel time |
31h 58min |
21h 47min |
| Charging time: |
1h 58min |
1h 11min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~257 kWh |
~180 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Rastplats Kvarndammen (10 min, 20% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (12 min, 11% → 49%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesla Supercharger (16 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
S-market Jomala (23 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 5:
Kauppakeskus Mylly (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger ABC (15 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Circle K Järve (17 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Circle K (14 min, 10% → 54%)
- Arrival: Riga
XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025 Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Preem Grums (10 min, 56% → 88%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger McDonald's (23 min, 19% → 95%)
-
Stop 3:
Virsi (10 min, 10% → 19%)
-
Stop 4:
Kuršu krogs (28 min, 10% → 36%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025 Won
The XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025 achieved a 611-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1425km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 11min vs 1h 58min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons