In our Oslo to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model S 2023 by 190 minutes, completing the 2461km route in 27h 20min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 27h 20min (190 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 26min
- Energy: ~402 kWh
- Distance: 2461km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Tesla Model S 2023 |
| Travel time |
27h 20min |
30h 30min |
| Charging time: |
1h 26min |
3h 47min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~443 kWh |
~444 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (10 min, 17% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Recharge Autohof Herzsprung (12 min, 18% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
mblty ROSI'S Autohof (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Tankstelle Schollstraße (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Raststation Europabrücke (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 7:
Electra Mantova Village (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 15% → 58%)
- Arrival: Rome
Tesla Model S 2023 Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (20 min, 24% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger (10 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger (17 min, 20% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Recharge Autohof Herzsprung (33 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 5:
Total Autohof Kleinhelmsdorf (10 min, 10% → 28%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell Autohof (25 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 7:
Aral Tankstelle Schollstraße (34 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 8:
Supercharger Raststätte Lanz - Brenner (18 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 9:
Tesla Supercharger (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 10:
Supercharger Hotel Real Fini Baia Del Re (32 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 11:
Giove Ovest (18 min, 10% → 29%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 190-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 2023 on this 2461km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 26min vs 3h 47min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~402 kWh vs ~463 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons