In our Oslo to Rome EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model S 2023 by 173 minutes, completing the 2463km route in 27h 37min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 9 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 27h 37min (173 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 1h 36min
- Energy: ~452 kWh
- Distance: 2463km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Tesla Model S 2023 |
| Travel time |
27h 37min |
30h 30min |
| Charging time: |
1h 36min |
3h 47min |
| Charging stops: |
9 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~443 kWh |
~444 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (10 min, 19% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Circle K Tappernøje Vest (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Van der Valk Resort Linstow (11 min, 15% → 63%)
-
Stop 4:
EnBW Kaufland Center (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Aral Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 7:
Shell Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 8:
Electra Old Wild West (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 9:
Osteria De'Giusti (12 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: Rome
Tesla Model S 2023 Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (20 min, 24% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger (10 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger (17 min, 20% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Recharge Autohof Herzsprung (33 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 5:
Total Autohof Kleinhelmsdorf (10 min, 10% → 28%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell Autohof (25 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 7:
Aral Tankstelle Schollstraße (34 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 8:
Supercharger Raststätte Lanz - Brenner (18 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 9:
Tesla Supercharger (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 10:
Supercharger Hotel Real Fini Baia Del Re (32 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 11:
Giove Ovest (18 min, 10% → 29%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 173-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 2023 on this 2463km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 36min vs 3h 47min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~452 kWh vs ~463 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons