In our Oslo to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance by 36 minutes, completing the 2609km route in 29h 28min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 29h 28min (36 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 47min
- Energy: ~426 kWh
- Distance: 2609km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
29h 28min |
30h 4min |
| Charging time: |
1h 47min |
2h 11min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~470 kWh |
~471 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (10 min, 17% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Wittstock (11 min, 19% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Tankstelle Radeburger Straße (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Bageterie Boulevard (10 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Shell Ladná směr Bratislava (11 min, 24% → 67%)
-
Stop 7:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 8:
Ledi MS (32 min, 10% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (11 min, 16% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Circle K Tappernøje Vest (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
EnBW Schnellladepark (10 min, 24% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
Netto Sophie-Charlotten-Straße (11 min, 19% → 66%)
-
Stop 5:
HPC Globus (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 6:
OC Karlov (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (20 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 9:
JP Putevi Srbije (36 min, 10% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 36-minute advantage over Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance on this 2609km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 47min vs 2h 11min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~426 kWh vs ~468 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons