In our Oslo to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 by 109 minutes, completing the 2609km route in 29h 28min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 29h 28min (109 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 47min
- Energy: ~426 kWh
- Distance: 2609km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 |
| Travel time |
29h 28min |
31h 17min |
| Charging time: |
1h 47min |
3h 41min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~470 kWh |
~469 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (10 min, 17% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Wittstock (11 min, 19% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Tankstelle Radeburger Straße (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Bageterie Boulevard (10 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Shell Ladná směr Bratislava (11 min, 24% → 67%)
-
Stop 7:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 8:
Ledi MS (32 min, 10% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Importgatan (19 min, 34% → 81%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger (10 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 3:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 10% → 33%)
-
Stop 4:
EnBW Schnellladepark (15 min, 13% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's TotalEnergies Autohof (21 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell Hansastraße (20 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Bageterie Boulevard (27 min, 10% → 77%)
-
Stop 8:
Mosonmagyaróvár Süd (18 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 9:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (27 min, 10% → 76%)
-
Stop 10:
OMV smer Beograd (35 min, 10% → 77%)
-
Stop 11:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (19 min, 10% → 49%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 109-minute advantage over Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 on this 2609km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 47min vs 3h 41min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~426 kWh vs ~436 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons