In our Oslo to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the XPENG G6 RWD Long Range 2025 by 39 minutes, completing the 2610km route in 29h 22min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 29h 22min (39 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 39min
- Energy: ~406 kWh
- Distance: 2610km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
XPENG G6 RWD Long Range 2025 |
| Travel time |
29h 22min |
30h 1min |
| Charging time: |
1h 39min |
1h 49min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~470 kWh |
~470 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (10 min, 22% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Wittstock (10 min, 27% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Tankstelle Radeburger Straße (10 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Bageterie Boulevard (10 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 6:
Greenway Bory Mall (10 min, 16% → 51%)
-
Stop 7:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 8:
Ledi MS (27 min, 10% → 86%)
- Arrival: Sofia
XPENG G6 RWD Long Range 2025 Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Importgatan (10 min, 30% → 80%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 23% → 83%)
-
Stop 3:
EnBW Schnellladepark (10 min, 19% → 78%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's TotalEnergies Autohof (10 min, 34% → 87%)
-
Stop 5:
Redoil (12 min, 10% → 87%)
-
Stop 6:
Tesco Hypermarket Aventin Shopping (12 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 7:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (12 min, 10% → 85%)
-
Stop 8:
Ledi MS (10 min, 10% → 76%)
-
Stop 9:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (23 min, 12% → 51%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 39-minute advantage over XPENG G6 RWD Long Range 2025 on this 2610km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 39min vs 1h 49min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~406 kWh vs ~497 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons