In our Oslo to Sofia EV duel, the VW ID.7 Pro S beats the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor by 88 minutes, completing the 2607km route in 29h 36min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The VW ID.7 Pro S needs only 9 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
VW ID.7 Pro S
- Total time: 29h 36min (88 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 2h 2min
- Energy: ~395 kWh
- Distance: 2607km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
VW ID.7 Pro S |
Volvo EX90 Twin Motor |
| Travel time |
29h 36min |
31h 4min |
| Charging time: |
2h 2min |
3h 13min |
| Charging stops: |
9 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~469 kWh |
~471 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
VW ID.7 Pro S Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (10 min, 21% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
HEM Tankstelle (10 min, 32% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's TotalEnergies Autohof (10 min, 25% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
SachsenEnergie City Center (10 min, 14% → 48%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Bageterie Boulevard (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Shell Ladná směr Bratislava (16 min, 13% → 64%)
-
Stop 8:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (18 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 9:
OMV A1 (28 min, 10% → 82%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (10 min, 17% → 48%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Lyngby Storcenter (10 min, 13% → 45%)
-
Stop 3:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 14% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Van der Valk Resort Linstow (10 min, 17% → 48%)
-
Stop 5:
Netto Sophie-Charlotten-Straße (12 min, 13% → 51%)
-
Stop 6:
Aral Tankstelle Radeburger Straße (18 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Bageterie Boulevard (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 8:
Tesco Hypermarket Aventin Shopping (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY Bábolna (11 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (35 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 11:
JP Putevi Srbije (53 min, 10% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the VW ID.7 Pro S Won
The VW ID.7 Pro S achieved a 88-minute advantage over Volvo EX90 Twin Motor on this 2607km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 2min vs 3h 13min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~395 kWh vs ~594 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons