In our Oslo to Tallinn EV duel, the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 11 minutes, completing the 1117km route in 27h 8min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge
- Total time: 27h 8min (11 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 16min
- Energy: ~185 kWh
- Distance: 1117km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
27h 19min |
27h 8min |
| Charging time: |
1h 26min |
1h 16min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~201 kWh |
~201 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (10 min, 20% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (12 min, 11% → 49%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesla Supercharger (16 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
S-market Jomala (23 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 5:
Kauppakeskus Mylly (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger ABC (14 min, 10% → 54%)
- Arrival: Tallinn
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Lekhyttans Kök & Kiosk (19 min, 14% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesla Supercharger (13 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
S-market Jomala (21 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
Neste Riviera Masku (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Liikenneasema Kivihovi (13 min, 17% → 59%)
- Arrival: Tallinn
Why the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Won
The Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge achieved a 11-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1117km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 16min vs 1h 26min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons