In our Oslo to Zagreb EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Kia Niro EV by 150 minutes, completing the 2014km route in 23h 5min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 5min (150 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 7min
- Energy: ~329 kWh
- Distance: 2014km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Kia Niro EV |
| Travel time |
23h 5min |
25h 35min |
| Charging time: |
1h 7min |
3h 36min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~363 kWh |
~363 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (10 min, 17% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Recharge Autohof Herzsprung (12 min, 18% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
mblty ROSI'S Autohof (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Max-Plank-Straße (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 6:
Raststation Trieben (12 min, 10% → 63%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Kia Niro EV Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Importgatan (15 min, 22% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (19 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger (12 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 4:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 10% → 30%)
-
Stop 5:
HEM Tankstelle (15 min, 11% → 44%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger SB Tankstelle (18 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 7:
McDonald's - Autohof Brück (23 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 8:
mblty ROSI'S Autohof (14 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 9:
ATU (16 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 10:
Aral Max-Plank-Straße (23 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 11:
eCarUp Pendlerparkplatz (20 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 12:
Raststation Kammern (15 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 13:
IONITY Dobrenje Zahod (16 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 150-minute advantage over Kia Niro EV on this 2014km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 7min vs 3h 36min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~329 kWh vs ~348 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons