In our Paris to Belgrade EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 by 51 minutes, completing the 1768km route in 17h 22min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 22min (51 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 0min
- Energy: ~289 kWh
- Distance: 1768km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
17h 22min |
18h 13min |
| Charging time: |
1h 0min |
1h 51min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~318 kWh |
~320 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Engie Aire de Brumath Ouest (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle (11 min, 18% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
Smatrics Lidl (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
Dul Jug (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 5:
Odmorište Novska Jug (15 min, 16% → 64%)
- Arrival: Belgrade
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Aire de Keskastel Ouest (10 min, 18% → 42%)
-
Stop 2:
P+M Mitfahrerparkplatz A8 Karlsbad (14 min, 11% → 46%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Euro Rastpark (10 min, 10% → 35%)
-
Stop 4:
Hofoldinger Forst Süd (10 min, 10% → 35%)
-
Stop 5:
BP Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
Gewerbepark Pöllan (16 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 8:
Odmorište Novska Jug (26 min, 10% → 69%)
- Arrival: Belgrade
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 51-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 on this 1768km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 0min vs 1h 51min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~289 kWh vs ~308 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons