In our Paris to Belgrade EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 17 minutes, completing the 1771km route in 17h 17min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 17min (17 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 54min
- Energy: ~276 kWh
- Distance: 1771km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
17h 34min |
17h 17min |
| Charging time: |
1h 11min |
54min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~319 kWh |
~319 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Aire de Keskastel Ouest (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
Gartencenter Streb (10 min, 22% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Esso Tankstelle Arnulfstraße (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Wagrainer Straße (12 min, 12% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
Dul Jug (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 6:
Odmorište Novska Jug (19 min, 12% → 70%)
- Arrival: Belgrade
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Engie Aire de Brumath Ouest (11 min, 17% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
Electra Jimmy's Fun Park (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Wagrainer Straße (10 min, 11% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Dul Jug (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 5:
Odmorište Novska Jug (13 min, 18% → 61%)
- Arrival: Belgrade
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 17-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1771km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 54min vs 1h 11min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~276 kWh vs ~325 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons