In our Paris to Belgrade EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the smart #1 Pro+ by 87 minutes, completing the 1771km route in 17h 36min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 8, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 36min (87 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 13min
- Energy: ~318 kWh
- Distance: 1771km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
smart #1 Pro+ |
| Travel time |
17h 36min |
19h 3min |
| Charging time: |
1h 13min |
2h 22min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~319 kWh |
~320 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Aire de Keskastel Ouest (10 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
Gartencenter Streb (10 min, 20% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
Esso Tankstelle Arnulfstraße (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Wagrainer Straße (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 5:
Dul Jug (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 6:
Odmorište Novska Jug (20 min, 11% → 72%)
- Arrival: Belgrade
smart #1 Pro+ Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Orbeval (10 min, 37% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (16 min, 13% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle Karlsruher Straße (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Tankstelle (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Auto & Service PIA Landsberger Straße (12 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 6:
Walserberg Süd (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 7:
Hotel Mühlbacherhof (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Avtocestno počivališče Radovljica Jug (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (15 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 10:
Odmorište Novska Jug (21 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 11:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 10% → 43%)
- Arrival: Belgrade
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 87-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro+ on this 1771km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 13min vs 2h 22min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~318 kWh vs ~323 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons