In our Paris to Berlin EV duel, the Audi e-tron GT beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 11 minutes, completing the 1057km route in 10h 37min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi e-tron GT needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi e-tron GT
- Total time: 10h 37min (11 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 53min
- Energy: ~236 kWh
- Distance: 1057km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi e-tron GT |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
10h 37min |
10h 48min |
| Charging time: |
53min |
1h 5min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~190 kWh |
~190 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Delfood Dépôt (11 min, 26% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle Aachener Straße 1100 (17 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (15 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Total Autohof (10 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger ibis Styles (10 min, 13% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Shell Eupen (12 min, 19% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Lichtendorf Süd (11 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (18 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Irxleben (14 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Audi e-tron GT Won
The Audi e-tron GT achieved a 11-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1057km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 53min vs 1h 5min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons