In our Paris to Berlin EV duel, the Tesla Model 3 Performance beats the Vinfast VF9 by 17 minutes, completing the 1052km route in 10h 19min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on August 26, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Vinfast VF9's 475km range doesn't beat the Tesla Model 3 Performance's 424km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Tesla Model 3 Performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model 3 Performance
- Total time: 10h 19min (17 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 38min
- Energy: ~186 kWh
- Distance: 1052km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Tesla Model 3 Performance |
Vinfast VF9 |
| Travel time |
10h 19min |
10h 36min |
| Charging time: |
38min |
55min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~189 kWh |
~189 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Tesla Model 3 Performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Shell Eupen (11 min, 11% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Euro Rastpark (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle Hämelerwald (17 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Vinfast VF9 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Shell Eupen (12 min, 16% → 45%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Lichtendorf Süd (11 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (18 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Irxleben (14 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Tesla Model 3 Performance Won
The Tesla Model 3 Performance achieved a 17-minute advantage over Vinfast VF9 on this 1052km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 38min vs 55min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~186 kWh vs ~272 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons