In our Paris to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 14 minutes, completing the 556km route in 6h 3min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 1 charging stops compared to 2 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 6h 3min (14 min faster)
- Charging stops: 1
- Charging time: 10min
- Energy: ~91 kWh
- Distance: 556km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
6h 3min |
6h 17min |
| Charging time: |
10min |
21min |
| Charging stops: |
1 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~100 kWh |
~101 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Lidl (10 min, 18% → 39%)
- Arrival: Bern
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Mobilize Lounge Avia (11 min, 23% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
Lidl (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 14-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 556km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 1 stops vs 2 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 10min vs 21min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~91 kWh vs ~92 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons