In our Paris to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance by 18 minutes, completing the 2303km route in 23h 3min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 3min (18 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 18min
- Energy: ~376 kWh
- Distance: 2303km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
23h 3min |
23h 21min |
| Charging time: |
1h 18min |
1h 34min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~415 kWh |
~415 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Autohof Herrieden (12 min, 13% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
HPC Fachmarktzentrum Franz-Schubert-Straße (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV DN69 (10 min, 11% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (13 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Geistkircher Straße Rohrbach (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Bonfelder Straße (10 min, 18% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Total Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
City Outlet Wels-Nord (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
HPC Fachmarktzentrum Franz-Schubert-Straße (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 6:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV DN69 (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 8:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (18 min, 10% → 76%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 18-minute advantage over Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance on this 2303km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 18min vs 1h 34min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~376 kWh vs ~413 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons