In our Paris to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model S 2023 by 227 minutes, completing the 2303km route in 22h 58min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 58min (227 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 13min
- Energy: ~358 kWh
- Distance: 2303km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Tesla Model S 2023 |
| Travel time |
22h 58min |
26h 45min |
| Charging time: |
1h 13min |
4h 50min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~415 kWh |
~414 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (10 min, 22% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Autohof Herrieden (10 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
HPC Fachmarktzentrum Franz-Schubert-Straße (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV DN69 (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (Truck) (12 min, 14% → 64%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Tesla Model S 2023 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Lidl (10 min, 20% → 28%)
-
Stop 2:
Autohof Ramstein (15 min, 13% → 40%)
-
Stop 3:
24-ARAL Autohof (29 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 4:
Total Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 27%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Tankstelle (39 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 6:
Raststation Steinhäusl (10 min, 10% → 18%)
-
Stop 7:
Parkplatz Margaretengürtel (44 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 8:
Auchan Korzó (45 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 9:
Rompetrol A1 Sagu Sens Timisoara (49 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 10:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (39 min, 10% → 75%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 227-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 2023 on this 2303km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 13min vs 4h 50min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~358 kWh vs ~433 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons