In our Paris to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron quattro by 38 minutes, completing the 2299km route in 23h 20min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 20min (38 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 33min
- Energy: ~422 kWh
- Distance: 2299km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron quattro |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
23h 58min |
23h 20min |
| Charging time: |
2h 9min |
1h 33min |
| Charging stops: |
10 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~414 kWh |
~415 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron quattro Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Orbeval (10 min, 46% → 74%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (11 min, 15% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
BFS Business Fleet Services (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
Total Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 14% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Weierbachweg (14 min, 12% → 69%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Bábolna (10 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (25 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 9:
OMV (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 10:
Supercharger Prima Shopping Center (19 min, 10% → 77%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Geistkircher Straße Rohrbach (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
Bonfelder Straße (10 min, 21% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Total Tankstelle (10 min, 11% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
City Outlet Wels-Nord (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
HPC Fachmarktzentrum Franz-Schubert-Straße (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 6:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV DN69 (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 8:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (17 min, 10% → 74%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 38-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron quattro on this 2299km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 33min vs 2h 9min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~422 kWh vs ~432 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons