In our Paris to Bucharest EV duel, the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 by 28 minutes, completing the 2298km route in 24h 20min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 8, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 needs only 9 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220
- Total time: 24h 20min (28 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 2h 35min
- Energy: ~400 kWh
- Distance: 2298km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
24h 48min |
24h 20min |
| Charging time: |
2h 53min |
2h 35min |
| Charging stops: |
13 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~414 kWh |
~413 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aire de Verdun Saint Nicolas Sud (12 min, 21% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (11 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
Bonfelder Straße (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's (10 min, 13% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
Total Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
Electra Stop & Go Pendlerparkplatz Amstetten West (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 8:
da emobil Burger King Gaudenzdorfer Gürtel (12 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY Bábolna (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 10:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (23 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 11:
Rompetrol A1 Sagu Sens Timisoara (24 min, 10% → 82%)
-
Stop 12:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (17 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 13:
Kaufland Gavana (10 min, 10% → 46%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (11 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 2:
Bonfelder Straße (16 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
24 - Shell Autohof Neumarkt (16 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 5:
Electra Stop & Go Pendlerparkplatz Amstetten West (17 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 6:
Mosonmagyaróvár Süd (15 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 7:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (14 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 8:
MOL Szent Gellért pihenőhely (28 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 9:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (28 min, 10% → 72%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Won
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 achieved a 28-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 on this 2298km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 35min vs 2h 53min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~400 kWh vs ~401 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons