In our Paris to Budapest EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 35 e-tron by 107 minutes, completing the 1479km route in 13h 59min. The key advantage? 8 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 13h 59min (107 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 42min
- Energy: ~241 kWh
- Distance: 1479km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q4 35 e-tron |
| Travel time |
13h 59min |
15h 46min |
| Charging time: |
42min |
2h 23min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~266 kWh |
~267 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Autohof Herrieden (12 min, 13% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's Margaretengürtel (10 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Audi Q4 35 e-tron Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Orbeval (18 min, 21% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's (15 min, 16% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
Bonfelder Straße (11 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Frankenhöhe Süd (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
24 - Shell Autohof Neumarkt (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Bayerischer Wald Süd (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 8:
Shell Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 9:
JET Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 10:
Raststation Sankt Pölten (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 11:
HPC Autohaus Kamper (11 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 12:
IONITY Bábolna (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 107-minute advantage over Audi Q4 35 e-tron on this 1479km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 42min vs 2h 23min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~241 kWh vs ~282 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons