In our Paris to Helsinki EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model S 2023 by 367 minutes, completing the 2481km route in 30h 39min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 9 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 30h 39min (367 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 2h 7min
- Energy: ~455 kWh
- Distance: 2481km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Tesla Model S 2023 |
| Travel time |
30h 39min |
36h 46min |
| Charging time: |
2h 7min |
6h 41min |
| Charging stops: |
9 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~447 kWh |
~458 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aachener Land Süd (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Autohaus Weber (10 min, 15% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Süd (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Konarzewo (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Gajewo Wschód (25 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 7:
Circle K (23 min, 10% → 31%)
-
Stop 8:
VS Express (14 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 9:
Neste (14 min, 10% → 69%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Tesla Model S 2023 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Q8 Süd (10 min, 27% → 35%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle (35 min, 13% → 73%)
-
Stop 3:
Autohof Bantorf (18 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Euro Rastpark Irxleben/Hohenwarsleben (15 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (27 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
Biedronka Sycowska (79 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 7:
Ford Gołębiewski (113 min, 10% → 87%)
-
Stop 8:
Rastplatz (41 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 9:
Pulkveža Brieža (22 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 10:
Hesburger (19 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 11:
Topauto (22 min, 10% → 30%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 367-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 2023 on this 2481km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 7min vs 6h 41min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~455 kWh vs ~467 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons