In our Paris to London EV duel, the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge beats the Renault Kangoo E-Tech by 38 minutes, completing the 452km route in 5h 20min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 8, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge needs only 1 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge
- Total time: 5h 20min (38 min faster)
- Charging stops: 1
- Charging time: 12min
- Energy: ~75 kWh
- Distance: 452km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault Kangoo E-Tech |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
5h 58min |
5h 20min |
| Charging time: |
40min |
12min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
1 |
| Energy used |
~81 kWh |
~81 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault Kangoo E-Tech Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Aire de la Baie de Somme, Sailly-Flibeaucourt (14 min, 14% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Eurotunnel Flexiplus Lounge, Coquelles (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Channel Gateway, Hythe (16 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: London
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
ENGIE Eurotunnel Main Terminal, Coquelles (12 min, 20% → 58%)
- Arrival: London
Why the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Won
The Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge achieved a 38-minute advantage over Renault Kangoo E-Tech on this 452km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 1 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 12min vs 40min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~75 kWh vs ~92 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons