In our Paris to Milan EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model Y Performance by 14 minutes, completing the 848km route in 8h 38min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 8h 38min (14 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 20min
- Energy: ~132 kWh
- Distance: 848km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Tesla Model Y Performance |
| Travel time |
8h 38min |
8h 52min |
| Charging time: |
20min |
31min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~153 kWh |
~153 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de La Ferté, Saint-Ambreuil (10 min, 39% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Les Iles de Brissogne Sud, Brissogne (10 min, 14% → 58%)
- Arrival: Milan
Tesla Model Y Performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de La Ferté, Saint-Ambreuil (11 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Shopping Etrembières, Étrembières (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Les Iles de Brissogne Sud, Brissogne (10 min, 17% → 55%)
- Arrival: Milan
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 14-minute advantage over Tesla Model Y Performance on this 848km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 20min vs 31min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~132 kWh vs ~155 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons