In our Paris to Nice EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range by 18 minutes, completing the 931km route in 9h 9min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 9h 9min (18 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 30min
- Energy: ~171 kWh
- Distance: 931km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range |
| Travel time |
9h 9min |
9h 27min |
| Charging time: |
30min |
45min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~168 kWh |
~168 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de La Ferté, Saint-Ambreuil (10 min, 27% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de La Coucourde, La Coucourde (20 min, 13% → 80%)
- Arrival: Nice
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Mobilize Lounge Avia, Créancey (10 min, 28% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire des Chères Ouest, Les Cheres (10 min, 13% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de La Coucourde, La Coucourde (14 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de l'Arc, Rousset (11 min, 10% → 52%)
- Arrival: Nice
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 18-minute advantage over Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range on this 931km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 30min vs 45min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons