In our Paris to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Lotus Eletre by 38 minutes, completing the 1780km route in 19h 22min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 22min (38 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 51min
- Energy: ~277 kWh
- Distance: 1780km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Lotus Eletre |
| Travel time |
19h 22min |
20h 0min |
| Charging time: |
51min |
1h 25min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~320 kWh |
~320 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
EnBW Vennbahncenter (10 min, 27% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle Autohof Osnabrück-Hafen (10 min, 19% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
AVIA Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
Uno-X Danmark (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Importgatan (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Lotus Eletre Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Shell Eupen (10 min, 12% → 49%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Lütticher Straße Süd (10 min, 27% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Autohof (11 min, 12% → 52%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's Autohof Moorfleet (11 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
Clever Erhvervspark (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 6:
Uno-X Danmark (10 min, 14% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
McDonald's (11 min, 14% → 54%)
-
Stop 8:
Tradenvägen (12 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 38-minute advantage over Lotus Eletre on this 1780km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 51min vs 1h 25min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~277 kWh vs ~401 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons