In our Paris to Oslo EV duel, the Audi e-tron GT beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 14 minutes, completing the 1776km route in 20h 23min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q4 40 e-tron's 416km range doesn't beat the Audi e-tron GT's 389km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Audi e-tron GT needs only 9 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi e-tron GT
- Total time: 20h 23min (14 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 1h 50min
- Energy: ~397 kWh
- Distance: 1776km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
20h 37min |
20h 23min |
| Charging time: |
2h 2min |
1h 50min |
| Charging stops: |
10 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~320 kWh |
~321 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Bierset (10 min, 15% → 44%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Lütticher Straße Süd (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle Autohof Osnabrück-Hafen (15 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
REWE (15 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
bft Willer (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 6:
Burger King (12 min, 13% → 46%)
-
Stop 7:
Fastned Barbecue barn (11 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 8:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 9:
Supercharger Importgatan (15 min, 12% → 52%)
-
Stop 10:
Shell Svinesundparken (10 min, 10% → 37%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Carrefour Valenciennes (10 min, 47% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Debyestraße (18 min, 17% → 72%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle Teutopark (12 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 4:
KFC (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 5:
Decathlon (10 min, 12% → 47%)
-
Stop 6:
Clever Erhvervspark (12 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 8:
McDonald's (14 min, 13% → 61%)
-
Stop 9:
Tradenvägen (14 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi e-tron GT Won
The Audi e-tron GT achieved a 14-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 1776km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 50min vs 2h 2min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons