In our Paris to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron 55 by 121 minutes, completing the 2081km route in 22h 49min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 49min (121 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 24min
- Energy: ~340 kWh
- Distance: 2081km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron 55 |
| Travel time |
22h 49min |
24h 50min |
| Charging time: |
1h 24min |
3h 14min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~375 kWh |
~379 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aachener Land Süd (10 min, 21% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
EnBW Schnellladepark (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Konarzewo (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Olsze Północ (29 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 6:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Riga
Audi e-tron 55 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Q8 Le Rœulx Sud (17 min, 27% → 74%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle Aachener Straße 1100 (24 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (20 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Irxleben (20 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
Autohaus König (19 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Konarzewo (26 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 7:
MOP Gajewo Wschód (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 8:
Biedronka (31 min, 10% → 81%)
-
Stop 9:
Vilniaus (15 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 10:
Girelė (12 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 121-minute advantage over Audi e-tron 55 on this 2081km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 24min vs 3h 14min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~340 kWh vs ~513 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons