In our Paris to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi S6 Avant e-tron by 18 minutes, completing the 2081km route in 22h 49min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 49min (18 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 24min
- Energy: ~340 kWh
- Distance: 2081km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi S6 Avant e-tron |
| Travel time |
22h 49min |
23h 7min |
| Charging time: |
1h 24min |
1h 41min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~375 kWh |
~375 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aachener Land Süd (10 min, 21% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
EnBW Schnellladepark (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Konarzewo (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Olsze Północ (29 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 6:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Riga
Audi S6 Avant e-tron Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aachener Land Süd (12 min, 15% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
EnBW Schnellladepark (15 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Konarzewo (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Gajewo Wschód (20 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 6:
Circle K (22 min, 10% → 30%)
-
Stop 7:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 18-minute advantage over Audi S6 Avant e-tron on this 2081km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 24min vs 1h 41min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~340 kWh vs ~378 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons