In our Paris to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model S 2023 by 343 minutes, completing the 2081km route in 22h 49min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 49min (343 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 24min
- Energy: ~340 kWh
- Distance: 2081km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Tesla Model S 2023 |
| Travel time |
22h 49min |
28h 32min |
| Charging time: |
1h 24min |
5h 23min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~375 kWh |
~390 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aachener Land Süd (10 min, 21% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
EnBW Schnellladepark (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Konarzewo (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Olsze Północ (29 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 6:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Riga
Tesla Model S 2023 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Q8 Süd (10 min, 27% → 35%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle (35 min, 13% → 73%)
-
Stop 3:
Autohof Bantorf (18 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Euro Rastpark Irxleben/Hohenwarsleben (15 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (27 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
Biedronka Sycowska (69 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 7:
Hotel nad Wisłą & Gościniec (94 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 8:
Circle K (55 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 343-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 2023 on this 2081km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 24min vs 5h 23min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~340 kWh vs ~391 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons