In our Paris to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Kia Niro EV by 191 minutes, completing the 2084km route in 22h 42min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 42min (191 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 15min
- Energy: ~324 kWh
- Distance: 2084km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Kia Niro EV |
| Travel time |
22h 42min |
25h 53min |
| Charging time: |
1h 15min |
4h 19min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~375 kWh |
~376 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OBI (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
SB Tank Langer (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's Genshagen (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Konarzewo (10 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Olsze Północ (25 min, 11% → 84%)
-
Stop 6:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Riga
Kia Niro EV Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger ibis Styles (10 min, 17% → 37%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Shell Eupen (22 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Lichtendorf Süd (17 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (11 min, 10% → 33%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Lehrter See Süd (15 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 6:
Industrie und Gewerbepark Mittelelbe (23 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 7:
Autohaus König (25 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 8:
MOP Konarzewo (19 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 9:
Karczma Rzym (20 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 10:
Kaufland (60 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 11:
Circle K (20 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 12:
VS Express (17 min, 10% → 46%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 191-minute advantage over Kia Niro EV on this 2084km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 15min vs 4h 19min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~324 kWh vs ~360 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons