In our Paris to Riga EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 87 minutes, completing the 2089km route in 23h 19min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 19min (87 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 49min
- Energy: ~384 kWh
- Distance: 2089km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
24h 46min |
23h 19min |
| Charging time: |
3h 11min |
1h 49min |
| Charging stops: |
10 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~376 kWh |
~375 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Bierset (11 min, 15% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
OBI (17 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (17 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Irxleben (17 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Autohaus König (17 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Konarzewo (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 7:
Karczma Rzym (14 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 8:
Kaufland (52 min, 10% → 77%)
-
Stop 9:
Circle K (22 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 10:
VS Express (11 min, 10% → 42%)
- Arrival: Riga
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aachener Land Süd (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Autohaus Weber (10 min, 15% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Süd (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Konarzewo (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Gajewo Wschód (25 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 7:
Circle K (23 min, 10% → 31%)
-
Stop 8:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 87-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 2089km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 49min vs 3h 11min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~384 kWh vs ~387 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons