In our Paris to Riga EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron GT by 71 minutes, completing the 2085km route in 23h 19min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 19min (71 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 49min
- Energy: ~383 kWh
- Distance: 2085km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
23h 19min |
24h 30min |
| Charging time: |
1h 49min |
2h 45min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~375 kWh |
~379 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aachener Land Süd (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Autohaus Weber (10 min, 15% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Süd (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Konarzewo (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Gajewo Wschód (25 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 7:
Circle K (23 min, 10% → 31%)
-
Stop 8:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Riga
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY ibis Styles (13 min, 21% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
OBI (14 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (15 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Total Autohof (12 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Autohaus König (13 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Konarzewo (10 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 7:
Karczma Rzym (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Olsze Południe (41 min, 12% → 94%)
-
Stop 9:
Circle K (27 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 10:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 71-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 2085km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 49min vs 2h 45min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~383 kWh vs ~466 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons