In our Paris to Riga EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the VW ID. Buzz Pro LR by 95 minutes, completing the 2085km route in 23h 19min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 19min (95 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 49min
- Energy: ~383 kWh
- Distance: 2085km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
VW ID. Buzz Pro LR |
| Travel time |
23h 19min |
24h 54min |
| Charging time: |
1h 49min |
3h 9min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~375 kWh |
~380 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aachener Land Süd (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Autohaus Weber (10 min, 15% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Süd (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Konarzewo (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Gajewo Wschód (25 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 7:
Circle K (23 min, 10% → 31%)
-
Stop 8:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Riga
VW ID. Buzz Pro LR Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Le Rœulx Sud (10 min, 32% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Shell Eupen (16 min, 14% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Lichtendorf Süd (13 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (11 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Hansestraße (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
McDonald's Euro Rastpark Theeßen (15 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
Autohaus König (20 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 8:
MOP Konarzewo (15 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 9:
Karczma Rzym (12 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Olsze Południe (42 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 11:
Vilniaus (14 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 12:
Girelė (11 min, 10% → 43%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 95-minute advantage over VW ID. Buzz Pro LR on this 2085km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 49min vs 3h 9min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~383 kWh vs ~461 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons