In our Paris to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Honda e:Ny1 by 143 minutes, completing the 1423km route in 14h 7min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 8, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 7min (143 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 40min
- Energy: ~232 kWh
- Distance: 1423km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Honda e:Ny1 |
| Travel time |
14h 7min |
16h 30min |
| Charging time: |
40min |
2h 48min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~256 kWh |
~257 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aire de Mâcon, Saint-Albain (10 min, 29% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Les Iles de Brissogne Sud, Brissogne (10 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport, Guardamiglio (10 min, 13% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
Arno Ovest, Reggello (10 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Rome
Honda e:Ny1 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Mobilize Lounge Avia, Créancey (10 min, 17% → 37%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de La Ferté, Saint-Ambreuil (11 min, 13% → 36%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de Bourg Teyssonge, Jasseron (19 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Aire de Bonneville, Bonneville (16 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Les Iles de Brissogne Sud, Brissogne (16 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 6:
Villarboit Sud, Villarboit (20 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport, Guardamiglio (16 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 8:
Secchia Ovest, Modena (18 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 9:
Ristorante Goyo, Calenzano (12 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 10:
Area Servizio Badia al Pino Ovest, Badia al Pino (18 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 11:
Giove Ovest, Giove (12 min, 10% → 37%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 143-minute advantage over Honda e:Ny1 on this 1423km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 40min vs 2h 48min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~232 kWh vs ~267 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons