In our Paris to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the smart #3 Pro+ by 73 minutes, completing the 1423km route in 14h 7min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 7min (73 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 40min
- Energy: ~232 kWh
- Distance: 1423km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
smart #3 Pro+ |
| Travel time |
14h 7min |
15h 20min |
| Charging time: |
40min |
1h 45min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~256 kWh |
~257 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aire de Mâcon, Saint-Albain (10 min, 29% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Les Iles de Brissogne Sud, Brissogne (10 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport, Guardamiglio (10 min, 13% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
Arno Ovest, Reggello (10 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Rome
smart #3 Pro+ Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de Venoy Chablis, Venoy (11 min, 50% → 73%)
-
Stop 2:
Mâcon Supercharger, Sancé (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Aire de Valleiry Sud, Valleiry (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Les Iles de Brissogne Sud, Brissogne (17 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Pit Stop Café, Trezzano sul Naviglio (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Secchia Ovest, Modena (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 7:
Ristorante Goyo, Calenzano (14 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 8:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest, Fabro (12 min, 10% → 51%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 73-minute advantage over smart #3 Pro+ on this 1423km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 40min vs 1h 45min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~232 kWh vs ~252 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons