In our Paris to Rome EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron 50 by 123 minutes, completing the 1428km route in 14h 16min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 16min (123 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 49min
- Energy: ~262 kWh
- Distance: 1428km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi e-tron 50 |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
16h 19min |
14h 16min |
| Charging time: |
2h 43min |
49min |
| Charging stops: |
10 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~257 kWh |
~256 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi e-tron 50 Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Total Aire de La Chaponne, Guillon-Terre-Plaine (10 min, 12% → 42%)
-
Stop 2:
Mobilize Lounge Avia, Créancey (12 min, 20% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Mâcon Supercharger, Sancé (16 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Aire de Valleiry Sud, Valleiry (21 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Les Iles de Brissogne Sud, Brissogne (24 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 6:
Muggiano Ovest, Milano (11 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 7:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport, Guardamiglio (20 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 8:
Cantagallo Ovest, Casalecchio di Reno (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 9:
Ristorante Goyo, Calenzano (20 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 10:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest, Fabro (19 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Rome
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aire de Mâcon, Saint-Albain (13 min, 20% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Les Iles de Brissogne Sud, Brissogne (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport, Guardamiglio (13 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 4:
Osteria De'Giusti, Ciliegi (12 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 123-minute advantage over Audi e-tron 50 on this 1428km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 49min vs 2h 43min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~262 kWh vs ~345 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons