In our Paris to Rome EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi RS e-tron GT by 45 minutes, completing the 1424km route in 14h 16min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 16min (45 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 49min
- Energy: ~261 kWh
- Distance: 1424km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Audi RS e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
14h 16min |
15h 1min |
| Charging time: |
49min |
1h 28min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~256 kWh |
~257 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aire de Mâcon, Saint-Albain (13 min, 20% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Les Iles de Brissogne Sud, Brissogne (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport, Guardamiglio (13 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 4:
Osteria De'Giusti, Ciliegi (12 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: Rome
Audi RS e-tron GT Route
- Start: Paris (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Total Aire de La Chaponne, Guillon-Terre-Plaine (10 min, 39% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Bourg Teyssonge, Jasseron (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Aire de Valleiry Sud, Valleiry (10 min, 23% → 54%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Les Iles de Brissogne Sud, Brissogne (14 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Pit Stop Café, Trezzano sul Naviglio (13 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Secchia Ovest, Modena (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 7:
Ristorante Goyo, Calenzano (11 min, 13% → 52%)
-
Stop 8:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest, Fabro (10 min, 10% → 49%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 45-minute advantage over Audi RS e-tron GT on this 1424km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 49min vs 1h 28min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~261 kWh vs ~318 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons